<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTML 5 and Flash &#8211; A reality check</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gregsramblings.com/2010/06/15/html-5-and-flash-a-reality-check/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gregsramblings.com/2010/06/15/html-5-and-flash-a-reality-check/</link>
	<description>Adobe, Technology, Photography, Aviation and other Ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 19:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://gregsramblings.com/2010/06/15/html-5-and-flash-a-reality-check/#comment-39659</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregsramblings.com/?p=1539#comment-39659</guid>
		<description>this site loads not good using my phone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this site loads not good using my phone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debating HTML 5 and Flash? Get educated first! &#171; Greg Wilson&#039;s Ramblings</title>
		<link>http://gregsramblings.com/2010/06/15/html-5-and-flash-a-reality-check/#comment-2790</link>
		<dc:creator>Debating HTML 5 and Flash? Get educated first! &#171; Greg Wilson&#039;s Ramblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregsramblings.com/?p=1539#comment-2790</guid>
		<description>[...] obvious choice for playback of video on non-HTML5-ready browsers.  Read my prior article, &#8220;HTML 5 and Flash &#8211; A Reality Check&#8220;.  Are you surprised to see that more people use IE6 than Safari?  I was!  Of course there [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] obvious choice for playback of video on non-HTML5-ready browsers.  Read my prior article, &#8220;HTML 5 and Flash &#8211; A Reality Check&#8220;.  Are you surprised to see that more people use IE6 than Safari?  I was!  Of course there [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Flash Classes and Lots of Flash News &#124; ProDesignTools</title>
		<link>http://gregsramblings.com/2010/06/15/html-5-and-flash-a-reality-check/#comment-2789</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Flash Classes and Lots of Flash News &#124; ProDesignTools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 05:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregsramblings.com/?p=1539#comment-2789</guid>
		<description>[...] A Picture is Worth 1,000 Words: Why Flash is Hard to Replace [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Picture is Worth 1,000 Words: Why Flash is Hard to Replace [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://gregsramblings.com/2010/06/15/html-5-and-flash-a-reality-check/#comment-2788</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregsramblings.com/?p=1539#comment-2788</guid>
		<description>Dan C, I&#039;m also part of the vast majority of users that never have to restart their browser due to Flash. I&#039;ve had to reinstall many programs over time (ie. antivirus, Microsoft Office, etc.) because some corruption has developed or some issues have arisen from upgrading. Even the best developed software in the world is going to have issues for at least some people if it&#039;s installed on 97% of computers. But if the software is corrupted, I just go and ahead and reinstall it, rather than live with the crashes and whinge on blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan C, I&#8217;m also part of the vast majority of users that never have to restart their browser due to Flash. I&#8217;ve had to reinstall many programs over time (ie. antivirus, Microsoft Office, etc.) because some corruption has developed or some issues have arisen from upgrading. Even the best developed software in the world is going to have issues for at least some people if it&#8217;s installed on 97% of computers. But if the software is corrupted, I just go and ahead and reinstall it, rather than live with the crashes and whinge on blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Langdon</title>
		<link>http://gregsramblings.com/2010/06/15/html-5-and-flash-a-reality-check/#comment-2787</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Langdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregsramblings.com/?p=1539#comment-2787</guid>
		<description>@Todd - good to hear a real world example of the pain developers have to go through to utilise HTML5. This is one of the reasons a lot of developers won&#039;t bother with it. Unless of course I can sell my clients on a project that will cost twice as much, but only reach 1% (how many iPhone/iPad users are there?) more target audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Todd &#8211; good to hear a real world example of the pain developers have to go through to utilise HTML5. This is one of the reasons a lot of developers won&#8217;t bother with it. Unless of course I can sell my clients on a project that will cost twice as much, but only reach 1% (how many iPhone/iPad users are there?) more target audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gregorywilson</title>
		<link>http://gregsramblings.com/2010/06/15/html-5-and-flash-a-reality-check/#comment-2786</link>
		<dc:creator>gregorywilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregsramblings.com/?p=1539#comment-2786</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that the incredible advances in mobile devices does change things.  ALL web developers are having to consider how their content looks on mobile and that consideration leads to different designs, especially for interactive content.  This revolution also complicates things for developers.  Now instead of only testing in IE, FF, Chrome, Safari, we have to test across multiple mobile platforms, multiple screen sizes that we never considered before, gestures support, etc..  fun fun!   However, it is compelling to think that most mobile devices will support Flash soon because once again, I will be able to rely on a consistent run-time with wide adoption which will sometimes spare me from the ever growing matrix of browser/OS versions.  Obviously it&#039;s a bit early for me to say too much about Flash on mobile, but the early indications are really encouraging.   I&#039;ve loaned my Android phone with Flash Player 10.1 to a several people and every single one of them was pleasantly surprised.  Even a hard-core anti-flash guy said, &quot;Ok..I have to admit, this is cool&quot;.   Now, if someone is reading this thinking that Flash is only about video and animations, they won&#039;t get what I&#039;m saying... but... Flash is FAR more than that.  I could go on for pages about how Flash is used in large-scale mission critical apps, complex real-time data visualization, backend integration with secure environments, P2P applications, adaptive bitrate streaming, etc., but each point would invite a new debate that I don&#039;t want to start on this blog post.  However, I do enjoy it when a Flash skeptic gives me 15 minutes to raise their awareness of what Flash is really about.  Usually after 5 minutes of showing them some real applications, they start to be intrigued.  After about 10 minutes, they hit the &quot;holy sh*t&quot; moment.  Then, if they are a coder, I show them &lt;a href=&quot;http://flex.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Flex&lt;/a&gt; and the entire conversation becomes a lot of fun.

Ok - I&#039;m done.  I do appreciate your comment.  Your point is a good one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that the incredible advances in mobile devices does change things.  ALL web developers are having to consider how their content looks on mobile and that consideration leads to different designs, especially for interactive content.  This revolution also complicates things for developers.  Now instead of only testing in IE, FF, Chrome, Safari, we have to test across multiple mobile platforms, multiple screen sizes that we never considered before, gestures support, etc..  fun fun!   However, it is compelling to think that most mobile devices will support Flash soon because once again, I will be able to rely on a consistent run-time with wide adoption which will sometimes spare me from the ever growing matrix of browser/OS versions.  Obviously it&#8217;s a bit early for me to say too much about Flash on mobile, but the early indications are really encouraging.   I&#8217;ve loaned my Android phone with Flash Player 10.1 to a several people and every single one of them was pleasantly surprised.  Even a hard-core anti-flash guy said, &#8220;Ok..I have to admit, this is cool&#8221;.   Now, if someone is reading this thinking that Flash is only about video and animations, they won&#8217;t get what I&#8217;m saying&#8230; but&#8230; Flash is FAR more than that.  I could go on for pages about how Flash is used in large-scale mission critical apps, complex real-time data visualization, backend integration with secure environments, P2P applications, adaptive bitrate streaming, etc., but each point would invite a new debate that I don&#8217;t want to start on this blog post.  However, I do enjoy it when a Flash skeptic gives me 15 minutes to raise their awareness of what Flash is really about.  Usually after 5 minutes of showing them some real applications, they start to be intrigued.  After about 10 minutes, they hit the &#8220;holy sh*t&#8221; moment.  Then, if they are a coder, I show them <a href="http://flex.org" rel="nofollow">Flex</a> and the entire conversation becomes a lot of fun.</p>
<p>Ok &#8211; I&#8217;m done.  I do appreciate your comment.  Your point is a good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gregorywilson</title>
		<link>http://gregsramblings.com/2010/06/15/html-5-and-flash-a-reality-check/#comment-2785</link>
		<dc:creator>gregorywilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregsramblings.com/?p=1539#comment-2785</guid>
		<description>Hey Dan - what sites are you seeing crashes?  I use TONS of sites that have lots of Flash and never have to restart.  I&#039;m not denying that you are having problems.. I&#039;m just curious as the content you are viewing.  Enterprise customers use Flash/Flex in mission critical apps so if it so buggy that it required browser restarts multiple times per day, we would have never survived.

Can you send me a list of sites that cause the issues?  If you are not comfortable leaving it here, please email me at gregsramblings@gmail.com.

Thanks!

Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dan &#8211; what sites are you seeing crashes?  I use TONS of sites that have lots of Flash and never have to restart.  I&#8217;m not denying that you are having problems.. I&#8217;m just curious as the content you are viewing.  Enterprise customers use Flash/Flex in mission critical apps so if it so buggy that it required browser restarts multiple times per day, we would have never survived.</p>
<p>Can you send me a list of sites that cause the issues?  If you are not comfortable leaving it here, please email me at <a href="mailto:gregsramblings@gmail.com">gregsramblings@gmail.com</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Williams</title>
		<link>http://gregsramblings.com/2010/06/15/html-5-and-flash-a-reality-check/#comment-2784</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregsramblings.com/?p=1539#comment-2784</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s sites like http://Disney.com that help to drive Flash adoption rate way up. Updating the Flash plugin, for most people, can be very seamless compared to installing a new browser.

I noticed Disney has updated their site to use less Flash, used to be entirely Flash, but they still uses a ton of Flash. They are a great example of why Flash is not going anywhere anytime soon, to replace all their games, videos and to be completely HTML5 will take forever. Steve Jobs is on their board, but they have to face all the realities addressed above, so they will be a good indicator of where technology will go and how soon it will get there.

BTW, I just worked on a site for a large company that starts with a &quot;D&quot; and they wanted an all HTML5 site with Flash fallback for IE. Many of the request we have been done must faster in Flash, but they wanted a Flash type UI in HTML5, but still work on all browsers. What a nightmare, there are so many browser based exceptions in our code, it reminds me of HTML in the late 90&#039;s early 2000s, The problem now is that we have two - three times as many browsers to code for then we did 10 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s sites like <a href="http://Disney.com" rel="nofollow">http://Disney.com</a> that help to drive Flash adoption rate way up. Updating the Flash plugin, for most people, can be very seamless compared to installing a new browser.</p>
<p>I noticed Disney has updated their site to use less Flash, used to be entirely Flash, but they still uses a ton of Flash. They are a great example of why Flash is not going anywhere anytime soon, to replace all their games, videos and to be completely HTML5 will take forever. Steve Jobs is on their board, but they have to face all the realities addressed above, so they will be a good indicator of where technology will go and how soon it will get there.</p>
<p>BTW, I just worked on a site for a large company that starts with a &#8220;D&#8221; and they wanted an all HTML5 site with Flash fallback for IE. Many of the request we have been done must faster in Flash, but they wanted a Flash type UI in HTML5, but still work on all browsers. What a nightmare, there are so many browser based exceptions in our code, it reminds me of HTML in the late 90&#8242;s early 2000s, The problem now is that we have two &#8211; three times as many browsers to code for then we did 10 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan C</title>
		<link>http://gregsramblings.com/2010/06/15/html-5-and-flash-a-reality-check/#comment-2783</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregsramblings.com/?p=1539#comment-2783</guid>
		<description>This whole Flash-is-Great argument would hold water IF Flash worked.

If I go view a page for which I don&#039;t have full HTML5 support, the page just looks wrong.   If I view a page heavy with Flash, the browser crashes and it costs me time ($) to get back to work.

Adobe, please get off your ass and fix Flash.  I&#039;ve had to relaunch my browsers three times today so far, with Flash 10.1.53.64.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole Flash-is-Great argument would hold water IF Flash worked.</p>
<p>If I go view a page for which I don&#8217;t have full HTML5 support, the page just looks wrong.   If I view a page heavy with Flash, the browser crashes and it costs me time ($) to get back to work.</p>
<p>Adobe, please get off your ass and fix Flash.  I&#8217;ve had to relaunch my browsers three times today so far, with Flash 10.1.53.64.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Lassoff</title>
		<link>http://gregsramblings.com/2010/06/15/html-5-and-flash-a-reality-check/#comment-2782</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Lassoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregsramblings.com/?p=1539#comment-2782</guid>
		<description>I am a Flash Fan-- However the data leaves out mobile support.  In 2009 more web session took place on mobile phones than in traditional notebook or desktop computers.  This is the trend that is going to have the most impact-- Not this silly HTML 5 vs Flash debate-- as if it is impossible for duplicative technologies to exist...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Flash Fan&#8211; However the data leaves out mobile support.  In 2009 more web session took place on mobile phones than in traditional notebook or desktop computers.  This is the trend that is going to have the most impact&#8211; Not this silly HTML 5 vs Flash debate&#8211; as if it is impossible for duplicative technologies to exist&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HTML 5 and Flash – A reality check &#124; Lively Flash Tuts</title>
		<link>http://gregsramblings.com/2010/06/15/html-5-and-flash-a-reality-check/#comment-2781</link>
		<dc:creator>HTML 5 and Flash – A reality check &#124; Lively Flash Tuts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregsramblings.com/?p=1539#comment-2781</guid>
		<description>[...] Direct Link [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Direct Link [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tink</title>
		<link>http://gregsramblings.com/2010/06/15/html-5-and-flash-a-reality-check/#comment-2780</link>
		<dc:creator>Tink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregsramblings.com/?p=1539#comment-2780</guid>
		<description>Its feasible that the mobile markets will move much quicker with browser upgrades due to the lifetime of a phone.

Also like you I suspect we will see adoption rates of browsers increase with HTML 5 as devs will build stuff that require it. When a user stumbles across a site that needs a newer browser they will probably install it. This is why the Flash Player has such good penetration as people dev stuff that required new versions, users come across it and upgrade, but this hasn&#039;t been the case with HTML, HTML devs instead opting for graceful degrdation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its feasible that the mobile markets will move much quicker with browser upgrades due to the lifetime of a phone.</p>
<p>Also like you I suspect we will see adoption rates of browsers increase with HTML 5 as devs will build stuff that require it. When a user stumbles across a site that needs a newer browser they will probably install it. This is why the Flash Player has such good penetration as people dev stuff that required new versions, users come across it and upgrade, but this hasn&#8217;t been the case with HTML, HTML devs instead opting for graceful degrdation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HTML 5 and Flash – A reality check &#124; Flash Stock Files</title>
		<link>http://gregsramblings.com/2010/06/15/html-5-and-flash-a-reality-check/#comment-2779</link>
		<dc:creator>HTML 5 and Flash – A reality check &#124; Flash Stock Files</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregsramblings.com/?p=1539#comment-2779</guid>
		<description>[...] See more here  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See more here  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://gregsramblings.com/2010/06/15/html-5-and-flash-a-reality-check/#comment-2778</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregsramblings.com/?p=1539#comment-2778</guid>
		<description>Most of my non-developer relations don&#039;t care about technology. The want to use Facebook, broswe for stuff or share their fotos and maybe do a bit of blogging. As long as it works. They dont even know who Adobe is or that there is such a thing a webstandards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of my non-developer relations don&#8217;t care about technology. The want to use Facebook, broswe for stuff or share their fotos and maybe do a bit of blogging. As long as it works. They dont even know who Adobe is or that there is such a thing a webstandards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedr</title>
		<link>http://gregsramblings.com/2010/06/15/html-5-and-flash-a-reality-check/#comment-2777</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 07:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregsramblings.com/?p=1539#comment-2777</guid>
		<description>Hi,

While its nice to see the statistics presented side by side like that, I think the majority of developers are fully aware of the imbalance.  The problem is not with the actuality of the situation but with the perception of the situation. Flash has always been a favourite (in my opinion unfair) whipping boy of the standards crowd, but from what I can see this attitude was always quite localised. You could predict what a person&#039;s opinion of Flash was fairly accurately by the developer demographic they inhabited, and from my experience, once you left the environs of developers, people (clients/customers) were at worst ambivillent and at best enthusiatic about Flash. I think that this has now changed. The wave of negative publicity has penetrated outside the tech community on an alarming scale. Friends of mine who have no tech background whatsoever have mentioned this to me without prompting. One even mentioned Flash Player&#039;s security vulnerabilities. I think the problem for Flash now is not statistical or for the most part based on fact or evidence, but is a problem of (mis)perception, and from talking with other Flash developers, there is a strong lack of confidence in Adobe&#039;s ability to reverse this situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>While its nice to see the statistics presented side by side like that, I think the majority of developers are fully aware of the imbalance.  The problem is not with the actuality of the situation but with the perception of the situation. Flash has always been a favourite (in my opinion unfair) whipping boy of the standards crowd, but from what I can see this attitude was always quite localised. You could predict what a person&#8217;s opinion of Flash was fairly accurately by the developer demographic they inhabited, and from my experience, once you left the environs of developers, people (clients/customers) were at worst ambivillent and at best enthusiatic about Flash. I think that this has now changed. The wave of negative publicity has penetrated outside the tech community on an alarming scale. Friends of mine who have no tech background whatsoever have mentioned this to me without prompting. One even mentioned Flash Player&#8217;s security vulnerabilities. I think the problem for Flash now is not statistical or for the most part based on fact or evidence, but is a problem of (mis)perception, and from talking with other Flash developers, there is a strong lack of confidence in Adobe&#8217;s ability to reverse this situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Paton</title>
		<link>http://gregsramblings.com/2010/06/15/html-5-and-flash-a-reality-check/#comment-2776</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Paton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 07:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregsramblings.com/?p=1539#comment-2776</guid>
		<description>Wow, Site Catalyst is fantastic. I didn&#039;t even know it existed, but as I just bought CS5 I have the subscription. Thanks very much for the tip, invaluable!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Site Catalyst is fantastic. I didn&#8217;t even know it existed, but as I just bought CS5 I have the subscription. Thanks very much for the tip, invaluable!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

